Knowledge base · Part X — The Personal-Affix System and Alignment
71. The Split-Intransitive (Active–Stative) Core
Do intransitive subjects form a single class or multiple classes in person agreement?
自動詞主語は人称一致において単一のクラスを形成するか、複数のクラスに分かれるか?
The foundational alignment fact: intransitive subjects split between the agentive (A-set) and patientive (O-set) exponents, and the Split-S vs Fluid-S question.
candidate topic from the first edition topic:person/alignment-split-intransitive read this topic as text
Local network
The chapter, its sections, the sources it cites, the chapters it cross-references, the forms it mentions most, and the claims grouped under it with the sources that assert, propose, doubt or reject each.
Sources
Related chapters
- Index of Grammatical Morphemes and Affixes ×22
- Index of Subjects ×7
- Tripartite, Nominative-Accusative, and the Central Alignment Debate ×3
- Architecture of the Personal-Affix System: The Four Persons and the S/A/O Paradigms ×2
- Object (Patient) Noun Incorporation ×1
- The Antipassive / Detransitive i- ×1
- Property-Concept (Adjectival) Predication without a Copula ×1
- Aims, Scope, and Design Philosophy of This Grammar ×1
- A Typological Profile of Hokkaido Ainu ×1
- Verbal Subclasses: A Valence-Based Word-Class Taxonomy ×1
- Transitivity, Valence Classes, and Ambitransitivity ×1
- Subject Incorporation and Possessor-Stranding ×1
Forms mentioned
=an 4i- 4i= 3en= 3apto as 2apto 2rittursere 1ku= 1arpa 1yay- 1u- 1a= 1sirsesek 1mean 1sesek 1merayke 1pirka 1poro 1hure 1as 1un= 1
Claims
A claim is one proposition; under it stand the statements of each source, with the stance that source takes. Claims are grouped by a model from the extracted statements and carry that status until reviewed.
Sections
·
What split-intransitive alignment predicts 7 sentences
What does the distinction between agentive and patientive intransitive subjects predict for person agreement?
All intransitive subjects use the S set 14 sentences· 4 examples
Do all intransitive subjects in Hokkaido Ainu use the same agreement forms?
Lexical classes, the unaccusative diagnostic, and incorporation 11 sentences
How do intransitive verbs with agent subjects differ from those with patient subjects in grammatical behavior?
Valency-changing morphology and the S set 7 sentences
When a transitive verb is detransitivized, how is its subject indexed?
Zero-place predicates and the valence boundary 11 sentences· 1 examples
How are verbs with no arguments, like weather verbs, indexed in person marking?
Ijäs's L2–L3 claims in this domain 6 sentences
Is participant information obligatorily marked on the verb or optionally cross-referenced by noun phrases?
The alignment label and the broader debate 1 claims ·13 sentences
What is the overall alignment pattern of person indexing in Hokkaido Ainu across different persons?
- First-person singular verbal marking shows nominative-accusative alignment, with ku- for S/A and en- for O, while second-person (e-, eci-) and third-person (zero) markers are neutral.1人称単数の動詞標示は主格・対格アラインメントを示し、S/AにはKu-、OにはEn-が用いられる一方、2人称(e-、eci-)と3人称(ゼロ)は中立型である。asserts bugaeva2022
- bugaeva2022:1.4 asserts checked