Skip to content

Knowledge base · Part X — The Personal-Affix System and Alignment

72. Tripartite, Nominative-Accusative, and the Central Alignment Debate

What alignment patterns do the person indexes on the verb exhibit across different person-number combinations?

動詞の人称標示は、異なる人称・数においてどのような格配列パターンを示すのか?

How the 1sg and indefinite cells show distinct A/S/O exponents (tripartite) against the accusative readings of other cells, and the system-wide synthesis — hierarchical/inverse vs active-stative vs tripartite — including ditransitive and clause-type alignment.

candidate topic from the first edition topic:person/alignment-hierarchical-and-the-debate read this topic as text

5claims
20statements
19sources
7examples
7sections
67first-edition sentences

Local network

The chapter, its sections, the sources it cites, the chapters it cross-references, the forms it mentions most, and the claims grouped under it with the sources that assert, propose, doubt or reject each.

Claims

A claim is one proposition; under it stand the statements of each source, with the stance that source takes. Claims are grouped by a model from the extracted statements and carry that status until reviewed.

Sections

·

The alignment question 1 claims ·4 sentences

How does the person-indexing paradigm align with typological categories like hierarchical, inverse, or active-stative?

  1. Ainu has a mixed system of expressing grammatical relations that includes elements of tripartite alignment.
    アイヌ語は三分子(三分型)配列の要素を含む文法関係表示の混成体系を持つ。
    analysis ainu system-wide
    asserts bugaeva2022

Row-wise alignment 4 claims ·9 sentences· 2 examples

What are the distinct morphological alignment patterns for each person-number cell in the verb paradigm?

  1. In affirmative clauses, first-person plural verbal agreement displays a tripartite alignment where A, S, and O are distinct.
    肯定節において、1人称複数の動詞一致はA、S、Oが別個に標示される三分型配列を示す。
    paradigm-cell ainu first-person plural
    asserts bugaeva2008
  2. Free pronouns exhibit a neutral pattern with unmarked A, S, and O, whereas verbal cross-reference affixes show tripartite alignment for exclusive first-person plural and indefinite/fourth person.
    自立代名詞が無標識の中立型格標示を示すのに対し、動詞の相互参照接辞は除外的1人称複数および不定人称/4人称において三分型配列を示す。
    analysis hokkaido/southwest person-split
    asserts bugaeva2014
  3. Verbal cross-reference marks first-person singular according to a nominative-accusative pattern and second and third persons according to a neutral pattern.
    動詞の相互参照は、1人称単数において主格・対格型を、2人称および3人称において中立型の配列を示す。
    analysis hokkaido/southwest person-split
    asserts bugaeva2014
  4. Verbal cross-referencing displays mixed alignment: nominative-accusative for first-person singular, neutral for second and third persons, and tripartite for exclusive first-person plural and indefinite.
    動詞の相互参照標示は混成型配列を示し、1人称単数は主格・対格型、2人称および3人称は中立型、除外的1人称複数および不定人称は三分型となる。
    analysis ainu system-wide
    asserts bugaeva2016
kuruma an wa ci=o tek arki=as
car exist CONJ 1PL.EXCL.A=board then come.PL=1PL.EXCL.S
‘There was a car, and we boarded it and came.’
takahashi2015:206 TOK Takahashi ex. 2
i=erampokiwen i=rewsire wa i=kore
4.O=pity 4.O=lodge CONJ 4.O=give
‘Take pity on me and give me lodging.’
nakagawa2024:170 SAR Nakagawa ex. 127

Catalogue of analyses 7 sentences

What different analyses have been proposed for the person-marking system, and what questions do they address?

The active attribution 7 sentences

How does an active-stative or split-intransitive analysis apply to the person-marking system?

Hierarchical effects in person combinations 16 sentences· 3 examples

How does the language treat combinations of speech-act participants in person marking, and what hierarchical effects are observed?

nep ka eci=kasuy pe an ya
something even 1SG.A>2SG.O=help NMLZ exist Q
‘Is there anything I can help you with?’
nakagawa2024:173 SAR Nakagawa ex. 128, after Honda 2001: 44
hunak wa arki=an ru-we an
where from come.PL=4.S track-POSS exist
‘Where have you come from?’
nakagawa2024:176 CHI Nakagawa ex. 140, woman addressing an adult man
wen kamuy a=maketa wa a=rayke ru-we ne
bad god 4.A=defeat CONJ 4.A=kill track-POSS COP
‘The evil kamuy was defeated and killed.’
nakagawa2024:177 CHI Nakagawa ex. 145

Third person and the two-affix cap 13 sentences· 2 examples

How is third person marked in the verb, and what is the interpretation of zero marking?

seta cep nukar
dog fish see
‘The dog sees the fish.’
ijas2023 constructed HK
topenpe hekattar ku=kore
sweets children 1SG.A=give
‘I gave the children sweets.’
nakagawa2024:127 SAR Nakagawa ex. 11a

Synthesis 11 sentences

What is the most defensible synchronic label for the overall alignment of the person-indexing system?