Knowledge base · source
Bugaeva 2021
Bugaeva, Anna (2021). Unspecified participant: A case of antipassive in Ainu. Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions (TSL 130). John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.
db.aynu.org/2021-anna-bugaeva-unspecified-participant-a-case-of-antipassive-in-a prior-analysis general text held locally
10chapters citing
13citing sentences
0examples
0statements extracted
0claims with a stance
Chapters citing this source
Sentences of the first edition citing this source
- Her work on Ainu applicatives provided a cross-linguistically situated analysis of the three applicative prefixes e-, ko-, and o-; her analysis of the antipassive placed Ainu within the comparative typology of antipassive constructions; and her work on possession and causatives has refined the standard valency analysis. no page The History of Ainu Language Description and Previous Research
- The valency-changing operations that feed the calculus — the applicatives, the causatives, the antipassive i-, and the reflexive and reciprocal prefixes — are catalogued in , , , , , and ; ; . no page Transitivity, Valence Classes, and Ambitransitivity
- Older accounts derive the detransitive prefix from the fourth-person object; Bugaeva argues in the opposite direction, connecting the antipassive to O-incorporation of a generic noun; Nam proposes a generic-noun source *hi/*ihi 'thing, place' for the detransitive prefix directly ; ; ‹contested›. 235–239 The Indefinite/Fourth Person: Forms, Reference, and Agent-Defocusing
- The prefix must also be distinguished from the fourth-person object pronoun i=, which is an O-form of the indefinite/fourth series alongside A-form a= and S-form =an; the two are kept apart by the transitivity class of their host, not by the meaning of the argument ; . 235–239 The Split-Intransitive (Active–Stative) Core
- Her Lesson 9 account of i- as an antipassive filling the object position with a generic 'thing/place' meaning aligns in substance with the Bugaeva line; Satō uses a derivational-prefix label without the term 'antipassive' ; ; ‹contested›. 235–236 The Split-Intransitive (Active–Stative) Core
- Satō’s textbook treats the identical prefix as a derivational i- ‘people, someone’ and uses no antipassive label ; ; ; ‹contested›. no page Valency, Voice, and Noun Incorporation: Overview
- Antipassive i- reduces a transitive to intransitive by absorbing the object slot with a generic argument; re-adding an applicative restores transitive valency with a new object, which is then accessible to further incorporation or relativization by the same logic as any other applied object ; : no page Applicative Stacking, Ordering, and the Feeding of Relativization
- Bugaeva's antipassive reanalysis argues from three converging criteria that i- meets the typological definition of an antipassive: it systematically demotes the Patient/Theme/Recipient from a core object position; its output always carries an unspecified or generic object reading; and it is discourse-conditioned, appearing precisely where the speaker defocuses the Patient to foreground the Agent or the activity ; . 232–237 The Antipassive / Detransitive i-
- Both are segmentally identical, and both can appear on the same verb surface, but their distributional profiles diverge ; . no page The Antipassive / Detransitive i-
- The antipassive thus preceded the pronoun ; ‹contested›. 235–239 The Antipassive / Detransitive i-
- A diachronic line also links Object NI to the antipassive prefix : Bugaeva proposes that i- arose from grammaticalization of O-incorporation of a generic noun, with the 4th-person pronoun i= derived secondarily from the antipassive , while Nam reconstructs the source as a distinct generic-noun stem ; the dispute belongs to ‹contested›. 235–239 Object (Patient) Noun Incorporation
- The prefix is analysed as an antipassive on syntactic, semantic, and discourse grounds by Bugaeva (2021), and labelled accordingly by Nakagawa (2024: 190–192) and Ijäs (Lesson 9) ; . no page Oblique Incorporation and the Syntactic-vs-Lexicalist Debate
- ANTIP glosses the detransitivizing prefix i- throughout the grammar, following Bugaeva's explicit antipassive analysis . no page Abbreviations and Glossing-Symbol Conventions