Knowledge base · Part XVIII — Information Structure, Sentence-Final Particles, and Minor Classes
140. Topic and Focus Marking: anak(ne), patek, and ka
Which particles mark topic and focus in Hokkaido Ainu, and what distinctions do they make between thematic and contrastive topics and restrictive, additive, and scalar focus?
北海道アイヌ語で主題と焦点を標示する助詞は何か、また主題と対照主題、限定的・付加的・スケール的焦点の区別をどう表すか。
The topic/contrastive-topic particle anak~anakne and the focus-sensitive particles patek 'only' and ka 'also/even': thematic vs contrastive topic, restrictive/additive/scalar focus, and the NPI use of ka.
candidate topic from the first edition topic:discourse/topic-marking-anakne read this topic as text
Local network
The chapter, its sections, the sources it cites, the chapters it cross-references, the forms it mentions most, and the claims grouped under it with the sources that assert, propose, doubt or reject each.
Sources
| Source | Citations | Without page | Statements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refsing 1986 | 104 | 64 | |
| Nakagawa 2024 | 99 | 49 | |
| Satō 2008 | 95 | 44 | |
| Fukuda 1961 | 11 | ||
| Kindaichi & Chiri 1936 | 7 | 4 | |
| Shibatani 1990 | 7 | 4 | |
| aynu-corpora Discord 2023–2026 | 4 | 4 | |
| Bugaeva 2012 | 3 | 2 | |
| Murasaki 2025 | 3 | 2 | |
| Bugaeva 2015 | 2 | 1 | |
| Nakagawa & Fukazawa 2022 | 2 | 1 | |
| Ijäs 2023 | 1 | 1 | |
| Tamura 1996 | 1 | ||
| ILCAA Ainu materials 1976 | 1 | ||
| Vovin 2022 | 1 | 1 |
Related chapters
- Index of Grammatical Morphemes and Affixes ×27
- Index of Subjects ×12
- Pragmatic Word-Order Permutation, Dislocation, and Argument Ellipsis ×3
- Cleft, Pseudocleft, and Nominalization-Based Focus ×3
- Reference Tracking and Argument Continuity ×3
- The Sentence-Final Particle System and Illocutionary Force ×2
- Personal, Reflexive, and Emphatic Pronouns ×2
- Negative-Polarity Indefinites and the Scope of Negation ×2
- Architecture of the Personal-Affix System: The Four Persons and the S/A/O Paradigms ×1
- The Indefinite/Fourth Person: Forms, Reference, and Agent-Defocusing ×1
- Interrogative, Indefinite, and Negative-Polarity Pro-forms ×1
- The Nominalization-plus-Copula Evidential Schema ×1
- Basic Constituent Order and Head-Final Syntax ×1
- Pro-Drop, (Non)configurationality, and the Pronominal-Argument Debate ×1
- Oblique and Adjunct Syntax; Verbless and Presentational Clauses ×1
- Conjunctions and Discourse Connectives ×1
Forms mentioned
anak 12anakne 7patek 6ka 6hem 3ki 2korka 2ne 2poka 2pokay 2patek ani 2ta 1tasi 1tap 1…p ne 1…hi ne 1wakka 1sake 1toan pe 1kani 1eani 1*ku= anakne 1*en= anakne 1asinuma 1yak 1an-yak 1an 1neyke 1neanpe 1takup 1takupi 1ani 1ani patek 1kay 1nep ka 1nen ka 1ney ta ka 1hemem 1X hem Y hem 1usa 1
Claims
A claim is one proposition; under it stand the statements of each source, with the stance that source takes. Claims are grouped by a model from the extracted statements and carry that status until reviewed.
- The particle neyke marks a topic ('as for').neyke は主題を表す(「〜は」)。asserts murasaki2025
- murasaki2025:51 asserts checked
- The particle ta emphasizes the immediately preceding element to express a wishful meaning like 'if only it were...'.ta は直前の語句を強調して、「〜だったらいいのになあ」という願望の表現を表す。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:330 asserts checked
- The emphatic particle ta can correlate with the sentence-final particle oka.強調の ta は終助詞 oka と呼応することもある。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:330 asserts checked
- tas(i) emphasizes the immediately preceding word or phrase and can correlate with the sentence-final particle nek.tas(i) は直前にある語句を強調し、終助詞 nek と呼応することがある。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:330 asserts checked
- The emphatic particle meaning 'indeed / especially' is used as esta in the Shizunai dialect and as estap in the Tokachi dialect.直前の語句を強調する助詞は、静内方言では esta、十勝方言では estap の形で使われる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:330 asserts checked
- esta and estap frequently correlate with the sentence-final particle ne.esta と estap は終助詞 ne と呼応することも多い。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:330 asserts checked
- As an adverbial particle, kane is used in set expressions such as sekor kane, tapne kane, neno kane, and teeta kane.副助詞としての kane は、sekor kane、tapne kane、neno kane、teeta kane など決まった表現で使われる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:330 asserts checked
- In expressions such as tapne kane, neno kane, and teeta kane, kane was added for metrical and rhythmic reasons to smooth phrasing, resulting in fixed idiomatic expressions without an emphatic or unexpected sense.tapne kane、neno kane、teeta kane などにおける kane は意外性や強調性を伴わず、むしろ口調を整える音律的条件で付加されて常套句化したと考えられる。proposes nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:331 proposes checked
Sections
·
The delimiting-particle (副助詞) layer 22 claims ·8 sentences
What class of particles encodes information structure, and how do they attach to phrases without changing the host's grammatical category?
- The restrictive postposition anak functions as a topic or contrast marker, whereas ka functions as an inclusive particle meaning 'also/even/too'.とりたて後置詞 anak は主題・対照標識として機能し、一方 ka は「〜も/〜さえ」を表す包括後置詞として機能する。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- In Shizunai Ainu, the restrictive postpositions other than anak and ka include interrogative he, hene 'at least', pakno 'up to/even', distributive ranke, patek 'only/just', and keray 'only/no more than'.静内方言において、anak と ka 以外のとりたて後置詞には疑問の he、「せめて」の hene、「〜まで/〜さえ」の pakno、配分の ranke、「〜だけ」の patek、「〜にすぎない」の keray が含まれる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- Secondary particles (huku-joshi) attach to various units such as noun phrases, verb phrases, and adverb phrases to add meaning.副助詞は名詞句、動詞句、副詞句などさまざまなものに添えて、意味を加える役割を果たす。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:319 asserts checked
- When a secondary particle is attached to a noun phrase or adverb phrase, the whole constituent continues to function as a noun phrase or adverb phrase without changing its function.副助詞が名詞句や副詞句に添えられた場合はその機能を変えずに、全体として名詞句、副詞句として働く。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:319 asserts checked
- When a secondary particle is attached to a verb phrase, the resulting constituent cannot be used as a verb phrase as is, and must be restored to a verb phrase by adding a verb such as ki 'do' or other auxiliary verbs.副助詞が動詞句に添えられた場合には、そのまま動詞句としては使えないので、ki「〜をする」などの動詞を加えて動詞句に戻す必要がある。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:319 asserts checked
- A conjunctive particle such as kor cannot attach directly to a verb phrase marked by the secondary particle ka without an intervening verb like ki.副助詞 ka が付いた動詞句にはそれ自体では動詞句ではないため接続助詞 kor が直接つくことはできず、*a=kooyoyse ka a=okunnure ka kor は非文である。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:320 asserts checked
- The restrictive postpositions anak and ka appear to exist in all dialects of Ainu.限定後置詞anakおよびkaはアイヌ語のすべての方言に存在するように思われる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:46 asserts checked
- Apart from anak and ka, dialect differences in restrictive postpositions are considerable, resulting in very little overlap between the Saru and Shizunai dialects.anakとkaを除いて、限定後置詞における方言差はかなり大きく、沙流方言と静内方言の間で重複するものは極めて少ない。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:46 asserts anchored
- Restrictive postpositions may follow all types of nominals, noun expressions, and clitics such as case postpositions, conjunctionalizers, and nominalizers without altering their syntactical role.限定後置詞はあらゆる種類の体言、名詞表現のほか、格後置詞・接続詞化辞・名詞化辞といった接語にも後続でき、その統語的役割を変えない。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:79 asserts checked
- The two most frequent restrictive postpositions are anak and ka.最も頻度の高い2つのとりたて後置詞は anak と ka である。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- The two most frequent restrictive postpositions are anak and ka, which roughly correspond to the Japanese focus particles wa and mo, respectively.最も頻度の高い二つの限定後置詞は anak と ka であり、それぞれ日本語のとりたて助詞「は」と「も」におおよそ対応する。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- The particle easir means 'for the first time' or 'only then / precisely'.easir は「はじめて,こそ」という意味を表す。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:63 asserts checked
- The focus particle hetap can also appear in the form hetap ne, and it seems to be used mainly in oral literature as a somewhat formal expression.副助詞 hetap は hetap ne という形式が用いられることもあり、主に口承文芸でやや格式ばった言い方として用いられるようである。proposes sato2008
- sato2008:64 proposes checked
- The particle konna is predominantly used in oral literature, where it occurs in idiomatic expressions followed mainly by verbs ending in -natara, -atki, or -rototke.konna は主に口承文芸で用いられ、konna の後に主として -natara、-atki、-rototke で終わる動詞が来る慣用的な表現がある。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:65 asserts checked
- Before konna, nouns forming content clauses such as ru 'trace/appearance', sir 'state', hum 'sound', or haw 'voice/words' frequently occur.konna の前には、ru「跡」、sir「有様」、hum「音」、haw「話」のような、内容節を形成する名詞が来ることが多い。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:65 asserts checked
- There is a particle kan that appears to have a function similar to konna, although examples are extremely rare.例は極めて少ないが、konna と類似した機能を持つとみられる形式として kan がある。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:66 asserts checked
- takup can also be used independently as a quasi-adverbial particle.takup は単独で副助詞的に使われることもある。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:68 asserts checked
- The particle tap is placed after the element to be emphasized to express emphasis.tap は強調すべき要素の後に置かれて強調を表す。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:69 asserts checked
- tap is followed either by ne 'be' or by an 'exist'; usually ne is used, while an appears to be used especially to indicate exclamation.tap の後には ne「〜である」が来る場合と an「ある」が来る場合とがあり、通常は ne が用いられ、特に感歎の意味を明示する場合には an が用いられるようである。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:69 asserts checked
- The emphatic particle tasi is placed after the emphasized element.強調の副助詞 tasi は強める要素の後に置かれる。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:70 asserts checked
- ne yakka 'even / or' is an adverbial particle-like form.ne yakka「でも」は副助詞的な形式である。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:351 asserts checked
- The topic particle anakne and particles of emphasis such as amun and easir can mark objects, other noun phrases, and adverbials.主題助詞 anakne や amun、easir などの強調助詞は、目的語やその他の名詞句、さらには副詞類をも標示することができる。asserts shibatani1990
- shibatani1990:38 asserts checked
anak and anakne: the topic particle 15 claims ·0 sentences
How does the topic particle anak(ne) mark a phrase as the current topic of talk?
- The particles anak and anakne mark the topic of a sentence or express contrast.助詞 anak および anakne は、文の主題を提示したり、対照を表したりする。asserts nakagawa2024, sato2008
- nakagawa2024:320 asserts checked
- sato2008:21 asserts checked
- Topical NPs tend to occur clause-initially.主題の名詞句は節頭に置かれる傾向がある。asserts bugaeva2012
- bugaeva2012:472–473 asserts checked
- The postposition anak, which is sometimes extended to anakne, singles out an adjunct as the topic of an utterance, and an adjunct marked by anak(ne) in this function is generally placed at the beginning of the sentence.後置詞 anak(anakne に拡張されることもある)は連用修飾語を発話の主題として際立たせる働きをし、この機能において anak(ne) で標示された連用修飾語は通常文頭に置かれる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- The postposition anak, sometimes extended to anakne, serves to single out an adjunct as the topic of an utterance.後置詞 anak(anakne に拡張されることもある)は、発話の主題(トピック)として副加語を際立たせる働きをする。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- An adjunct marked by anak(ne) in topicalizing function is generally positioned at the beginning of the sentence.主題表示機能において anak(ne) で標示された副加語は、一般に文頭に置かれる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:171 asserts checked
- When anak(ne) marks topic or contrast, it also carries an element of emphasis, and in some instances it functions principally to express pure emphasis.anak(ne) が主題や対照を表す際にも強調の要素が含まれており、場合によっては純粋な強調を主として表す機能を持つ。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:172 asserts checked
- When anak(ne) marks topic or contrast, it also contains an element of emphasis.anak(ne)が主題や対比を標示する際、強調の要素も含んでいる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- The particle anak(ne) has a third function of pure emphasis, in which the emphatic element is more dominant than topic or contrast.助詞anak(ne)には、強調の要素が主題や対比の側面よりも優勢となる、純粋な強調という第3の用法がある。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- The particle anakne is an adverbial particle (focus particle) marking topic, similar in function to Japanese wa.anakne は「主題」を表す副助詞であり、日本語の「〜は」と働きが似ている。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:60 asserts checked
- The particles anak and anakne are used when the speaker makes a new predication about an entity that the hearer is already considered to know (a topic), or when contrasting two matters.anak, anakne は、聞き手も既に知っていると考えている事柄(主題)について話者が新しく叙述を加える文や、二つの事柄の対比をする場合に用いられる。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:62 asserts checked
- tane anakne, consisting of tane 'now' and the adverbial particle anakne 'TOP', is often used when comparing two occasions.tane anakne は tane「今」に副助詞 anakne「は」が付いたもので、二つの機会を比較するような場合にしばしば用いられる。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:300 asserts checked
- anak functions as a topic particle meaning 'as for'.anak は「〜は」を表す主題の助詞として機能する。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:366 asserts checked
- anakne functions as a topic particle meaning 'as for'.anakne は「〜は」を表す主題の助詞として機能する。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:366 asserts checked
- Ainu possesses the topic particle anak(ne), functioning similarly to the topic markers wa in Japanese and nun in Korean.アイヌ語には、日本語の「は」や朝鮮語の nun に相当する主題助詞 anak(ne) が存在する。asserts shibatani1990
- shibatani1990:38 asserts checked
- The use of the topic particle anak(ne) is not as prevalent in yukar as in colloquial Ainu.主題助詞 anak(ne) の使用は、口語アイヌ語ほどユカㇻにおいては一般的ではない。asserts shibatani1990
- shibatani1990:38 asserts checked
Form and attachment 2 claims ·8 sentences· 1 examples
What is the form and attachment of the topic particle, and does the choice between anak and anakne affect meaning?
- The topic particle anakne clarifies the boundary pause between constituents and can also attach to accusative arguments.主題助詞 anakne は成分間の休止を明確にする働きをし、対格にもつくことができる。asserts kindaichi1936
- kindaichi1936 asserts checked
- When anak is placed after a verb, the construction can be restored to a verb phrase by repeating the same verb instead of adding ki.動詞の後ろにanakが置かれた場合、kiなどを置く代わりに同じ動詞をもう一度繰り返すことで動詞句にすることができる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:321 asserts checked
Topic versus contrastive topic 1 claims ·4 sentences· 2 examples
How does the language distinguish a plain topic from a contrastive topic when using the same particle?
- The particle anak(ne) can mark an adjunct as contrasting with an explicit or implicit counterpart.助詞 anak(ne) は、明示的または暗示的な他の副加語と対比される副加語を標示することができる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:172 asserts checked
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
The given-information restriction 1 claims ·4 sentences
What condition restricts the topic particle to referents already known to the hearer, excluding first-mention items?
- The particles anak and anakne are difficult to use for something that is brought up as a topic for the first time at that moment, even if the hearer can recognize it immediately within the setting.たとえ聞き手が場面の中ですぐに認識できるようなものであっても、その時初めて話題に上ったものに anak, anakne は使いにくい。proposes sato2008
- sato2008:62 proposes extracted
Scope and weight compared with Japanese wa 1 claims ·4 sentences
How does the use of the topic particle differ in weight and frequency from Japanese wa, and what nuance does it add?
- Although anak(ne) resembles Japanese wa, it is not used as frequently as wa, so substituting wa directly with anak(ne) results in unnatural sentences.anak(ne)は日本語の「は」によく似た使い方をするが、「は」ほどよく使われるわけではないので、日本語の「は」をそのまま anak(ne) に置き換えていくと、不自然な文になる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:320 asserts checked
Person affixes and independent pronouns 8 sentences· 2 examples
Why can the topic particle not attach to person-agreement prefixes, and how are independent pronouns treated instead?
anak versus anakne and diachrony 2 claims ·7 sentences
Are anak and anakne used identically in texts, or does their frequency differ across dialects and sources?
- There is basically no semantic difference between anak and anakne.anak と anakne の間には基本的に意味の違いはない。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:320 asserts checked
- The forms anak and anakne are used interchangeably without an apparent difference in meaning, but in actual frequency anakne occurs nearly twice as often as anak.anak と anakne は意味に違いはないようであるが、実際の用例数は anakne の方が多く、anak の二倍近くにのぼる。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:63 asserts checked
Restrictive focus: patek and its near-synonyms 20 claims ·11 sentences· 1 examples
How does the particle patek mark restrictive focus, and to which phrase types can it attach?
- The restrictive postposition patek indicates the exclusiveness of the preceding adjunct, meaning 'only/just'.とりたて後置詞 patek は先行する付加語の排他性を表し、「〜だけ/〜ばかり」を意味する。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- The exclusiveness of an action can also be indicated by patek.行為の排他性もまた patek によって表されることがある。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- refines: The restrictive postposition patek indicates the exclusiveness of the preceding adjunct, meaning 'only/just'.— Extends the domain of exclusiveness marking from nominal adjuncts to actions.
- The particle poka means 'at least' or 'even just'.助詞 poka は「だけでも」「なりとも」を意味する。asserts kindaichi1936
- kindaichi1936 asserts checked
- The particle pateh expresses exclusivity or limitation ('only').助詞 pateh は限定(「~だけ」)を表す。asserts murasaki2025
- murasaki2025:52 asserts checked
- The particle patek expresses that only the specified entity is included and others are excluded.patek はそれだけが含まれ、他は含まれないことを表す。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:328 asserts checked
- patek possesses high independence and can stand sentence-initially in independent use.patek は独立用法において文頭に立つことができるなど、自立性が高い。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:328 asserts checked
- Whereas postpositional adverbial particles are generally placed after noun phrases, patek also occurs after verb phrases and adverb phrases.後置副助詞が一般に名詞句の後ろに後置されるのに対し、patek は動詞句や副詞句の後ろにも現れる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:328 asserts checked
- The author argues that patek should be analyzed as an adverbial particle with independent usage.著者は patek について、自立的用法を持った副助詞と考えるべきであると提案する。proposes nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:328 proposes checked
- While patek is attested widely across various dialects, takup is restricted and only attested in western Hokkaido dialects such as Horobetsu, Saru, and Chitose.patek は広く多様な方言に見られるが、takup は限定されており、幌別、沙流、千歳といった北海道西部の方言でしか確認できない。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:329 asserts checked
- poka and pokay indicate a minimum standard for realization and are used when demanding realization or in negative contexts where even that minimum cannot be achieved, but cannot be used for events that have already been realized.poka と pokay は実現を求める最低基準を示し、すでに実現したことには使えず、実現を要求する場合やそれすら実現できない否定的な意味の場合に用いられる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:329 asserts checked
- poka is used in comparatively western regions of Hokkaido (Horobetsu, Chitose, Saru, Shizunai, Ishikari, etc.), whereas pokay is used in regions such as Samani, Tokachi, Shiranuka, and Asahikawa.poka は幌別、千歳、沙流、静内、石狩など北海道の比較的西寄りの地域で用いられ、pokay は様似、十勝、白糠、旭川などで用いられる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:329 asserts checked
- Keray indicates not only the exclusiveness of the adjunct it follows, but also adds emphasis ('really').keray は後続する付加語の排他性を示すだけでなく、「実に」「本当に」という強調を加える。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- Keray is not as frequently employed as patek, and is mostly used in connection with quantity nouns.keray は patek ほど頻繁には用いられず、主に数量名詞とともに用いられる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- The postposition keray indicates exclusiveness of the preceding adjunct with added emphasis ('really'), is less frequent than patek, and is mostly used in connection with quantity nouns.後置詞 keray は先行する連用修飾語の排他性を強調(「実に」)を加えて表し、patek ほど頻繁には用いられず、主に数量名詞と関連して用いられる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:176 asserts checked
- The particle patek 'only, just' is a focus particle (adverbial particle) that negates other things and emphasizes a particular entity.patek「〜ばかり」は他のものを否定してあるものを強調する副助詞である。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:60 asserts checked
- The particle póka 'at least ...' is a focus particle that designates the bare minimum.póka「せめて〜だけでも」は最低限度のものを指定する「取り立て」の副助詞である。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:61 asserts checked
- When the element preceding patek is perceived negatively, the form takup 'only' may be added before it.patek の前に来るものが否定的にとらえられたものである場合、takup「だけ」という形式が付け加えられることがある。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:67 asserts checked
- The primary meaning of póka is to restrict to a minimum standard and strongly affirm it.póka の「表」の意味は最低基準に限定してそれを強く肯定する、というものである。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:68 asserts checked
- The particle póka frequently conveys an urgent nuance of 'at least that much'.póka は「せめてそれだけでも」という切迫したニュアンスを表すことが多い。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:68 asserts checked
- The construction ne yakka 'even' has a meaning similar to póka, but lacks its urgent nuance.ne yakka「でも」は póka に似た意味を持つが、切迫したニュアンスはない。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:68 asserts checked
Additive and scalar focus: ka, hem, and hene 2 claims ·0 sentences
What particles express additive focus, and how do they differ in implying scalarity or surprise?
- The particle otta can be interpreted as an adverbial particle meaning 'even, also', apparently used only for closely paired items such as 'man and woman'.otta は「〜も」のような意味の副助詞と解釈でき、「男と女」のような密接な対をなすものについてのみ使われる形式のようである。proposes sato2008
- sato2008:356 proposes checked
- otta functions as a particle meaning 'also, even'.otta は「〜も」を意味する助詞である。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:371 asserts checked
ka: additive, scalar, and NPI-forming 21 claims ·8 sentences· 1 examples
How does the particle ka express additive, scalar, or contrary-to-expectation focus, and how does it form negative polarity items?
- The inclusive postposition ka occurs with considerably higher frequency than anak and serves a wide variety of functions.包括後置詞 ka は anak よりもかなり高い頻度で現れ、多様な機能で用いられる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:172 asserts checked
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- In negative sentences, ka can convey the nuance of not even being included, although it ought to be.否定文において ka は、(当然含まれるべきであるのに)〜すら含まれないというニュアンスを表しうる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:174 asserts checked
- refsing1986:175 asserts checked
- contrasts(differs in scope): In positive sentences, ka means 'too/also' and marks an adjunct as included along with something not explicitly stated.— Contrasts the scalar 'not even' reading in negative contexts with the additive 'also' reading in positive contexts.
- In positive sentences, ka means 'too/also' and marks an adjunct as included along with something not explicitly stated.肯定文において ka は「〜もまた」を意味し、明示されていない他のものとともに付加語が含まれることを標示する。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:174 asserts checked
- refsing1986:175 asserts checked
- The assertive construction with [verb] ka ki usually conveys that something is included as well, contrary to expectation.「動詞 + ka ki」という断定構文は通常、含まれるべきでないのに〜もまた含まれているというニュアンスを帯びる。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:174 asserts checked
- refsing1986:175 asserts checked
- The main clause subject can be topicalized and extraposed from the sentence by using restrictive particles such as ka or yak-ka.主節主語はkaやyak-kaのような限定小粒子を用いて主題化され、文から外置されうる。asserts bugaeva2015
- bugaeva2015:56 asserts checked
- The particle ka ('also, even') is considered to have developed from the quasi-postposition ka ('top, above'), shifting in meaning from 'on top of that' to 'also'.助詞 ka(「も」)は格類似形式の ka(「上」)が「その上に」から「も亦」の意味へ転じたものと考えられる。proposes kindaichi1936
- kindaichi1936 proposes checked
- The particles ka and kay express adding and indicating something in addition to others ('also, even').ka および kay は、他のものにさらにつけ加えて示すことを表す(「〜も」)。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 asserts checked
- The form ka is used in Horobetsu, Saru, Chitose, Tokachi, Ishikari, and Sakhalin, whereas kay is used in eastern Hokkaido dialects such as Samani, Tokachi, Shiranuka, and Kushiro.幌別、沙流、千歳、十勝、石狩、樺太では ka が、様似、十勝、白糠、釧路などの北海道東部の方言では kay が用いられる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 asserts checked
- In the Tokachi dialect, both forms ka and kay are found.十勝方言では ka と kay の両方の形が見られるようである。proposes nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 proposes checked
- In some eastern Hokkaido dialects, the particle ka and conjunction particles ending in -ka (such as yakka, korka) appear with final -y as kay, yakkay, and korkay.北海道東部の一部の諸方言では、助詞 ka および -ka で終わる接続助詞(yakka、korka など)の末尾に -y が付加して kay、yakkay、korkay として現れる。asserts nakagawafukazawa2022
- nakagawafukazawa2022:8.3 asserts checked
- When ka marks an adjunct as inclusive, the cross-reference for the inclusion is generally not stated explicitly, but if stated explicitly, it is also marked by ka.ka が包括として副加語を標示する場合、包括の対照対象は一般には明示されないが、明示される場合にはその対照対象の副加語も ka で標示される。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:172 asserts checked
- The particle ka has an inclusive basic meaning and helps to enumerate another topic, subject, or object for which known information is repeated.助詞kaは包括的な基本的意味を持ち、既知の情報が繰り返されるもう一つの新たな主題(主語/目的語)を列挙する役割を果たす。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- When ka marks an adjunct as being included or excluded with something else, the cross-reference for the inclusion is generally not stated explicitly.kaが付加語を他のものに含まれる(否定文では含まれない)ものとして標示する際、包含の照応先は通常、明示されない。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- If the cross-reference for inclusion is explicitly stated, the adjunct covering that cross-reference will also be marked by ka.包含の照応先が明示される場合、その照応先となる付加語もまたkaによって標示される。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- The particle ka appears with negative predicates more often than with positive ones.助詞kaは肯定述語よりも否定述語とともに現れる頻度が高い。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- In negative sentences, ka may mark an adjunct as meaning 'not even (included)' or 'not (included) in the least'.否定文においてkaは付加語を「〜すら(含まれ)ない」または「少しも(含まれ)ない」という意味で標示することがある。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:173 asserts checked
- The particle ka means 'also/even' and expresses additive addition.助詞 ka は「〜も」という意味で、累加を表す。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:25 asserts checked
- Before negative expressions such as somo ki 'do not' and eaykap 'cannot', the particle ka tends to be used regularly, often with little of the contrastive nuance of 'also'.ka は、somo ki「しない」、eaykap「できない」のような否定の表現の前では規則的に用いられる傾向があり、その場合「〜も」のような特に他のものと対比するという意味はほとんどない場合も多い。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:60 asserts checked
- The particle ka 'also, even' is a focus particle that affirms an entity in addition to other things.ka「〜も」は、他のものに加えてあるものを肯定する「取り立て」の副助詞である。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:61 asserts checked
- The particle ka appears to express addition/inclusion accompanied by strong emotion, differing subtly from hem.ka は hem との違いは微妙だが、強い感情を伴った累加を表すようである。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:65 asserts checked
- ka functions as a focus particle meaning 'also, even'.ka は「〜も」を意味する取り立て助詞として機能する。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:369 asserts checked
hem, hemem, and hene: plain additive and alternative focus 14 claims ·5 sentences
How do hem and hene mark plain additive focus without scalar implications, as in 'both X and Y'?
- The secondary particle hem means 'also / as well' and is used when listing similar cases.副助詞hemは「〜も」を意味し、同様の事例を並べる時に用いる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:321 asserts checked
- In the Saru dialect, hemem is the reduplicated form of hem, emphasizing the inclusion of a matter even more strongly than hem.沙流方言において hemem は hem の重複形であり、その事柄が含まれていることを hem よりもいっそう強調する。reports nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 reports checked
- The particle hem is used almost exclusively in the Saru and Chitose dialects.hem はほぼ沙流・千歳方言でしか用いられない。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 asserts checked
- In the Saru and Chitose dialects, hemem is also used, but its occurrences are fewer than those of hem.沙流・千歳方言では hemem も使われるが、用例は hem より少ない。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 asserts checked
- The particle hemem is mainly used in the Horobetsu dialect, and is also found in Shiranuka and Abuta.hemem はおもに幌別方言で用いられており、白糠・虻田でも見られる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 asserts checked
- The usage of hemem in the Horobetsu dialect is largely identical to that of hem in the Saru dialect.幌別方言での hemem の用法は沙流方言の hem とほぼ同じであると思われる。proposes nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:322 proposes checked
- The particle hene expresses presenting something as an example, and through repetition it can coordinate similar items in parallel.hene は一例として提示するという意味があり、繰り返しによって同様のものを並列的に表すことができる。asserts nakagawa2024
- nakagawa2024:324 asserts checked
- The restrictive postposition hene marks an adjunct as the minimum of something expected, meaning 'at least'.限定後置詞heneは付加語を期待される最低限のものとして標示し、「少なくとも」を意味する。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:174 asserts checked
- There is a connection between the postposition hene ('at least') and the adverb hene ('incidentally').後置詞hene(「少なくとも」)と副詞hene(「ついでに」)の間には関連がある。asserts refsing1986
- refsing1986:174 asserts checked
- The particle hem also translates as 'also/even', having a meaning close to ka, but ka appears to be accompanied by stronger emotion.助詞 hem も「〜も」と訳され ka に近い意味を持つが、ka の方が強い感情を伴った表現であるとされる。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:25 asserts checked
- The particle hene 'or, even' is a focus particle indicating an alternative relationship with other entities.hene「〜でも」は、他のものと選択的な関係にあることを示す「取り立て」の副助詞である。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:61 asserts checked
- The particle he means 'or' or 'even', denoting one alternative among several choices.he は「〜でも」「〜か」を意味し、いくつかある選択肢の一つという意味を表す。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:63 asserts checked
- While the particle hem represents simple additive listing ('also'), ka has a more emotional nuance.hem が単純な累加であるのに対し、ka はもっと感情的なニュアンスがある。proposes sato2008
- sato2008:64 proposes checked
- There is a partially reduplicated form hemem corresponding to hem 'also', but its attested examples are few.hem に対応する部分的に重複した形として hemem という形式もあるが、用例は少ない。asserts sato2008
- sato2008:64 asserts checked