Skip to content

Knowledge base · Part XVIII — Information Structure, Sentence-Final Particles, and Minor Classes

141. Cleft, Pseudocleft, and Nominalization-Based Focus

How does the language express identificational and predicate focus using nominalization and the copula?

言語は名詞化とコピュラを用いて同一化焦点と述語焦点をどのように表現するか?

Identificational and predicate-focus constructions built on nominalization plus the copula (…p ne, …hi ne) and their relation to the evidential schema.

candidate topic from the first edition topic:discourse/cleft-nominalization-focus read this topic as text

0claims
0statements
8sources
7examples
8sections
71first-edition sentences

Local network

The chapter, its sections, the sources it cites, the chapters it cross-references, the forms it mentions most, and the claims grouped under it with the sources that assert, propose, doubt or reject each.

Related chapters

Forms mentioned

p 15ne 10pe 7hi 7an 5hawe 4patek 4ruwe 3a= 3siri 2humi 2ka 2anak 2[VP] p ne 2ruwe ne 2ru 2konna 2sekor a=ye p/hawe/katu ne 1[label] sekor a=ye [formal-noun] ne 1sekor 1katu 1sekor a=ye 1[name] sekor a=ye p ne 1a=ye 1ye 1sekor a=ye p ne 1[VP] p/hi ne 1[VP] p 1-p(e) 1-i 1[nominalized-clause] ne 1*ruwe ne 1p an 1pe ne ya? 1ya 1he 1kusu ne ruwe ne 1*ruwe ne kusu ne 1hem 1ki 1

Sections

·

Overview 7 sentences

What grammatical architecture does the language use to mark focus in the absence of dedicated focus affixes or particles?

The p/pe and hi nominalization cleft 5 sentences

How does the language form a cleft-like construction using a nominalizer and a copula after a person-marked verb phrase?

Argument focus and predicate focus 9 sentences· 3 examples

How does the language distinguish argument focus from predicate focus in nominalization-based constructions?

kani ku=e pe ne
1SG 1SG.A=eat NMLZ COP
‘I am the one who ate it.’
constructed SAR
cep a=e pe ne
fish 4.A=eat NMLZ COP
‘What one eats is fish.’
constructed SAR
ku=nu hi anak k=eramuan pe ne korka tasa itak anak k=eranpewtek
1SG.A=hear NMLZ TOP 1SG.A=understand NMLZ COP CONJ reply speech TOP 1SG.A=not.know
‘The question I heard I understand, but how to reply I do not know.’

The naming cleft: sekor a=ye … ne 8 sentences· 1 examples

How does the language construct a cleft that identifies a referent by its name or label?

tap a=ye katu Piratur sekor a=ye hawe ne
now 4.A=say manner-POSS Piratur QUOT 4.A=say voice-POSS COP
‘The current way of calling it is called Piratur.’
nakagawa2024:393 SAR Nakagawa ex. 778, after Kawamura 1985: 30

True cleft, pseudocleft, or nominal predication? 14 sentences

How does the language's nominalization-plus-copula construction relate to cross-linguistic categories of cleft, pseudocleft, and nominal predication?

Illocutionary force: the ne/an/∅ alternation 7 sentences· 1 examples

How does the language use the alternation of copula forms to indicate illocutionary force in nominalization-based clauses?

hemanta ne kusu ene siran hi an
why COP because thus appear NMLZ exist
‘Why has the situation come to be like this?’
nakagawa2024:411 SAR Nakagawa ex. 856

The evidential frame as focus and assertion 9 sentences

How does the language use evidential formal nouns in the same nominalization-plus-copula frame to express focus and assertion?

Focus particles and kakari-musubi concord 12 sentences· 2 examples

How does the language use adverbial particles to mark delimiting and scalar focus, and what is their distribution?

cikap ta ku=ne
bird EMPH 1SG.S=COP
‘Would that I were a bird!’
nakagawa2024:330 SAR Nakagawa ex. 560, after Tamura 1988b: 33
newaanpe patek tasi a=eranak nek
that FOC EMPH 4.A=worry FIN
‘That alone is precisely what worries me.’
nakagawa2024:337 SAR Nakagawa ex. 594, after Chiba University 2015: 160