Knowledge base · Part XI — Valency, Voice, and Noun Incorporation
76. Causee Marking, Ditransitive and Double Causatives
How does causativization create three-place predicates, what marks the causee, and how are double causatives formed?
使役化はどのように三項述語を作り、被使役者の標示と二重使役はどのように形成されるか?
How causativization of transitives builds three-place frames, the marking/indexing of the causee, and double causatives.
candidate topic from the first edition topic:valency/causee-marking-ditransitive-double-causative read this topic as text
Local network
The chapter, its sections, the sources it cites, the chapters it cross-references, the forms it mentions most, and the claims grouped under it with the sources that assert, propose, doubt or reject each.
Sources
| Source | Citations | Without page | Statements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bugaeva 2014 | 26 | 1 | 16 |
| Bugaeva & Kobayashi 2022 | 19 | 5 | |
| Satō 2023 | 16 | 3 | 9 |
| Nakagawa 2024 | 7 | ||
| Shibatani 1990 | 3 | 3 | |
| Bugaeva 2012 | 2 | 1 | |
| Murasaki 2025 | 2 | 1 | |
| Refsing 1986 | 2 | 2 | |
| Ijäs 2023 | 1 | 1 | |
| aynu-corpora Discord 2023–2026 | 1 | 1 | |
| Kobayashi 2015 | 1 | ||
| Kobayashi 2020 | 1 | 1 | |
| Takahashi 2017 | 1 | ||
| Biratori Ainu oral literature 1969 | 1 | ||
| Satō 2008 | 1 | 1 |
Related chapters
- Index of Grammatical Morphemes and Affixes ×9
- Index of Subjects ×6
- The Morphological Causative -re / -e / -te ×3
- Valency, Voice, and Noun Incorporation: Overview ×3
- The Permissive/Sociative Causative -yar ×2
- Object Indexing: Monotransitive and Ditransitive Clauses ×1
- The Applicative System: Overview and the Preverb-vs-Applicative Debate ×1
- The Transitivizer -ka and Lexical Valency Pairs ×1
- Transitivity, Valence Classes, and Ambitransitivity ×1
- The Verb Word and Its Position-Class Template ×1
Forms mentioned
i= 5-re 4-e 3-yar 2-re/-te/-e 2tuy-e 2a= 2r 2kor-e-re 2omarere 2-ar 1sinot 1ku= 1-te 1en= 1hapo 1tuy 1e= 1epakasnu 1kore 1a=e=tuy-e-re 1iyairaykere 1irankarapte 1-re/-te 1i- 1i-newsar-ka 1i-oripak-ka 1-e-re 1kor 1kor-e 1oma 1omare 1omare-re 1-V 1-ke 1-ka 1
Claims
A claim is one proposition; under it stand the statements of each source, with the stance that source takes. Claims are grouped by a model from the extracted statements and carry that status until reviewed.
Sections
·
Overview 5 sentences
What is the effect of the causative suffix on verb valency across intransitive and transitive bases?
The causee as object 1 claims ·6 sentences· 2 examples
When a causative verb is derived from an intransitive, what grammatical role does the former intransitive subject take?
- Causative verbs derived from intransitives with -V, -ka, or -ke promote the original S argument to O while introducing a new subject argument A.-V、-ka、-ke により自動詞から派生した使役動詞は、元の S 項を O に昇格させ、同時に新しい主語項 A を導入する。asserts bugaeva2014
- bugaeva2014 asserts checked
Causative of a transitive: the three-place frame 3 claims ·10 sentences· 1 examples
In a causative derived from a transitive verb, what are the grammatical roles of the new causer, the causee, and the original patient?
- Causativization of transitive (two-argument) verbs yields a double-object construction in Ainu.アイヌ語において、他動詞(2項動詞)の使役化は二重目的語構文を形成する。asserts bugaevakobayashi2022
- bugaevakobayashi2022:15.4 asserts checked
- bugaevakobayashi2022:15.6 asserts checked
- In causativization of transitive verbs with -V or -ka, the original object is retained and the original subject becomes a causee object, forming a double-object construction.-V および -ka による他動詞の使役化では、元の目的語が保持されたまま元の主語が被使役者目的語となり、二重目的語構造を形成する。asserts bugaeva2014
- bugaeva2014 asserts checked
- refines(differs in scope): Causativization of transitive (two-argument) verbs yields a double-object construction in Ainu.— Specifies the morphological markers (-V, -ka) and precise syntactic argument mapping for transitives forming double-object constructions.
- Although causativization of transitive verbs creates double-object constructions, overt expression of both objects simultaneously is avoided, with one typically omitted coreferentially.他動詞の使役化は二重目的語構文を作り出すが、両方の目的語を明示的に言い表すことは避けられ、通常いずれか一方が同一指示的に省略される。asserts bugaeva2014
- bugaeva2014 asserts checked
Person indexing: causee priority and secundative alignment 4 claims ·12 sentences
How does the language index two objects in a three-place causative verb given a two‑slot ceiling for person affixes?
- Verbs of giving and receiving express their arguments by combining portmanteau personal affixes with three-argument verb stems such as konte 'give' or koore 'hand over'.授受動詞は konte「与える」や koore「手渡す」のような3項動詞語幹に抱合人称接辞を接続して項を表現する。asserts murasaki2025
- murasaki2025:28 asserts checked
- When kore 'give' occurs without a person affix for the theme argument, the theme interpretation is recovered pragmatically via the verb's trivalent frame.動詞 kore「与える」が主題に相当する人称接辞を取らない場合でも、動詞が3個の項スロットを持つことにより語用論的含意によって主題が解釈される。asserts sato2023b
- sato2023b asserts checked
- On the three-argument verb kore 'give', only the recipient is indexed by object personal affixes, and the theme normally cannot be indexed.3項動詞 kore「与える」において、目的語として表示される人称は受領者のみであり、通常は主題の人称を表示できない。asserts sato2023b
- sato2023b asserts checked
- contrasts: On the three-argument verb omare 'put into', only the moved theme is indexed by object personal affixes, and the locative goal cannot be indexed.— Contrasts which semantic role is privileged for person indexing among three-argument verbs (recipient with kore vs theme with omare).
- On the three-argument verb omare 'put into', only the moved theme is indexed by object personal affixes, and the locative goal cannot be indexed.3項動詞 omare「入れる」において、動詞に表示される目的語の人称は移動する主題であり、移動先の場所を人称表示することはできない。asserts sato2023b
- sato2023b asserts checked
Double causatives 5 claims ·15 sentences· 2 examples
How does the language form double causatives, and what allomorphy rules apply at each step?
- Ainu permits double causatives, formed by adding a causative suffix to an already causativized transitive verb stem.アイヌ語には、既使役化された他動詞語幹に更なる使役接尾辞を付加する二重使役が存在する。asserts bugaevakobayashi2022
- bugaevakobayashi2022:15.4 asserts checked
- bugaevakobayashi2022:15.6 asserts checked
- Double causatives and causatives formed from bivalent transitives take two unmarked objects that share similar encoding and behavioral properties.二重使役および2価他動詞から形成された使役形は、符号化や統語的振る舞いにおいてほぼ同様の2つの無標識目的語をとる。asserts bugaeva2012
- bugaeva2012:486–487 asserts anchored
- supports: Causativization of transitive (two-argument) verbs yields a double-object construction in Ainu.— Affirms that causativized transitives take two unmarked objects like trivalent applicatives.
- The suffix -re/-e/-te can attach to all direct causative verbs to function as a secondary indirect causative marker.接尾辞 -re/-e/-te は、直接使役を表すすべての動詞に付加して二次的(間接)使役標識として機能することができる。asserts bugaeva2014
- bugaeva2014 asserts checked
- refines(differs in scope): Ainu permits double causatives, formed by adding a causative suffix to an already causativized transitive verb stem.— Specifies the morphology (-re/-e/-te) and role of the secondary causative marker that derives double causatives.
- In double causatives, two overt objects never appear simultaneously in actual clauses due to the omission of topical noun phrases and avoidance of co-occurring pronouns.二重使役構文において、話題の名詞句の省略や代名詞の共起回避により、実際の節中で2つの目的語が同時に現れることはない。asserts bugaeva2014
- bugaeva2014 asserts extracted
- refines(differs in scope): Although causativization of transitive verbs creates double-object constructions, overt expression of both objects simultaneously is avoided, with one typically omitted coreferentially.— Refines the general avoidance of overt co-occurring objects to double causatives specifically.
- The form iyomare-an expresses the meaning 'we pour liquor for someone'.iyomare-an という形式は「私たちが誰かのために酒を注ぐ」という意味を表す。asserts sato2023b
- sato2023b asserts checked
Combinatorial limits and related morphology 1 claims ·9 sentences
What are the combinatorial limits on co‑occurrence of causative with other morphology such as applicatives and incorporated objects?
- Direct causee objects can undergo noun incorporation and antipassivization, whereas indirect causee objects cannot.直接使役の被使役者目的語は名詞抱合や逆受動態化を受けることができるが、間接使役の被使役者目的語は受けることができない。asserts bugaevakobayashi2022
- bugaevakobayashi2022:15.4 asserts checked