Skip to content

Knowledge base · Part XI — Valency, Voice, and Noun Incorporation

76. Causee Marking, Ditransitive and Double Causatives

How does causativization create three-place predicates, what marks the causee, and how are double causatives formed?

使役化はどのように三項述語を作り、被使役者の標示と二重使役はどのように形成されるか?

How causativization of transitives builds three-place frames, the marking/indexing of the causee, and double causatives.

candidate topic from the first edition topic:valency/causee-marking-ditransitive-double-causative read this topic as text

14claims
38statements
15sources
5examples
6sections
57first-edition sentences

Local network

The chapter, its sections, the sources it cites, the chapters it cross-references, the forms it mentions most, and the claims grouped under it with the sources that assert, propose, doubt or reject each.

Claims

A claim is one proposition; under it stand the statements of each source, with the stance that source takes. Claims are grouped by a model from the extracted statements and carry that status until reviewed.

Sections

·

Overview 5 sentences

What is the effect of the causative suffix on verb valency across intransitive and transitive bases?

The causee as object 1 claims ·6 sentences· 2 examples

When a causative verb is derived from an intransitive, what grammatical role does the former intransitive subject take?

  1. Causative verbs derived from intransitives with -V, -ka, or -ke promote the original S argument to O while introducing a new subject argument A.
    -V、-ka、-ke により自動詞から派生した使役動詞は、元の S 項を O に昇格させ、同時に新しい主語項 A を導入する。
    form-function hokkaido/southwest/saru all -V-ka-ke
    asserts bugaeva2014
ku=sinot
1SG.A=play
‘I play.’
nakagawa2024:431 SAR Nakagawa ex. 954, after Tamura 1984
hapo en=sinot-te
mother 1SG.O=play-CAUS
‘Mother made me play.’
nakagawa2024:431 SAR Nakagawa ex. 955

Causative of a transitive: the three-place frame 3 claims ·10 sentences· 1 examples

In a causative derived from a transitive verb, what are the grammatical roles of the new causer, the causee, and the original patient?

  1. Causativization of transitive (two-argument) verbs yields a double-object construction in Ainu.
    アイヌ語において、他動詞(2項動詞)の使役化は二重目的語構文を形成する。
    form-function ainu all -re-e-te
    asserts bugaevakobayashi2022
  2. In causativization of transitive verbs with -V or -ka, the original object is retained and the original subject becomes a causee object, forming a double-object construction.
    -V および -ka による他動詞の使役化では、元の目的語が保持されたまま元の主語が被使役者目的語となり、二重目的語構造を形成する。
    form-function ainu all -V-ka
    asserts bugaeva2014
  3. Although causativization of transitive verbs creates double-object constructions, overt expression of both objects simultaneously is avoided, with one typically omitted coreferentially.
    他動詞の使役化は二重目的語構文を作り出すが、両方の目的語を明示的に言い表すことは避けられ、通常いずれか一方が同一指示的に省略される。
    distribution hokkaido/southwest all
    asserts bugaeva2014
a=e=tuy-e-re
4.A=2SG.O=cut-TRVZ-CAUS
‘I made you cut the grapevines.’
bugaevakobayashi2022:§4.1.2 SAR Nakagawa corpus K7803233UP.144; Handbook ex. 6c

Person indexing: causee priority and secundative alignment 4 claims ·12 sentences

How does the language index two objects in a three-place causative verb given a two‑slot ceiling for person affixes?

  1. Verbs of giving and receiving express their arguments by combining portmanteau personal affixes with three-argument verb stems such as konte 'give' or koore 'hand over'.
    授受動詞は konte「与える」や koore「手渡す」のような3項動詞語幹に抱合人称接辞を接続して項を表現する。
    form-function sakhalin all kontekoore
    asserts murasaki2025
  2. When kore 'give' occurs without a person affix for the theme argument, the theme interpretation is recovered pragmatically via the verb's trivalent frame.
    動詞 kore「与える」が主題に相当する人称接辞を取らない場合でも、動詞が3個の項スロットを持つことにより語用論的含意によって主題が解釈される。
    analysis hokkaido/chitose all koretopenpe
    asserts sato2023b
  3. On the three-argument verb kore 'give', only the recipient is indexed by object personal affixes, and the theme normally cannot be indexed.
    3項動詞 kore「与える」において、目的語として表示される人称は受領者のみであり、通常は主題の人称を表示できない。
    distribution ainu all kore
    asserts sato2023b
  4. On the three-argument verb omare 'put into', only the moved theme is indexed by object personal affixes, and the locative goal cannot be indexed.
    3項動詞 omare「入れる」において、動詞に表示される目的語の人称は移動する主題であり、移動先の場所を人称表示することはできない。
    distribution ainu all omare
    asserts sato2023b

Double causatives 5 claims ·15 sentences· 2 examples

How does the language form double causatives, and what allomorphy rules apply at each step?

  1. Ainu permits double causatives, formed by adding a causative suffix to an already causativized transitive verb stem.
    アイヌ語には、既使役化された他動詞語幹に更なる使役接尾辞を付加する二重使役が存在する。
    existence ainu exists -re
    asserts bugaevakobayashi2022
  2. Double causatives and causatives formed from bivalent transitives take two unmarked objects that share similar encoding and behavioral properties.
    二重使役および2価他動詞から形成された使役形は、符号化や統語的振る舞いにおいてほぼ同様の2つの無標識目的語をとる。
    distribution hokkaido/southwest all
    asserts bugaeva2012
  3. The suffix -re/-e/-te can attach to all direct causative verbs to function as a secondary indirect causative marker.
    接尾辞 -re/-e/-te は、直接使役を表すすべての動詞に付加して二次的(間接)使役標識として機能することができる。
    distribution ainu all -re-e-te
    asserts bugaeva2014
  4. In double causatives, two overt objects never appear simultaneously in actual clauses due to the omission of topical noun phrases and avoidance of co-occurring pronouns.
    二重使役構文において、話題の名詞句の省略や代名詞の共起回避により、実際の節中で2つの目的語が同時に現れることはない。
    distribution ainu all
    asserts bugaeva2014
  5. The form iyomare-an expresses the meaning 'we pour liquor for someone'.
    iyomare-an という形式は「私たちが誰かのために酒を注ぐ」という意味を表す。
    form-function ainu all iyomare-an
    asserts sato2023b
a=e=kor-e-re
4.A=2SG.O=have-CAUS-CAUS
‘I caused you to give (something to someone).’
constructed
a=omarere akusu sonno ka oripak pe ne kusu
4.A=put.in-CAUS-CAUS CONJ really FOC be.polite NMLZ COP because
‘I had [her] put [it] away, and since she is truly a courteous person —’
biratori1969 SAR Kaizawa Turushino, uwepeker 'Kikipo Cicipor Ukoysoytak Hi Anu' [biratori/005/008#82]

Combinatorial limits and related morphology 1 claims ·9 sentences

What are the combinatorial limits on co‑occurrence of causative with other morphology such as applicatives and incorporated objects?

  1. Direct causee objects can undergo noun incorporation and antipassivization, whereas indirect causee objects cannot.
    直接使役の被使役者目的語は名詞抱合や逆受動態化を受けることができるが、間接使役の被使役者目的語は受けることができない。
    distribution ainu all i-
    asserts bugaevakobayashi2022