Skip to content

Chapter 85Reflexive si- in Verbal and Spatial Constructions

Bodily motion and change, indirect reflexivity, causatives and pretending, locative coreference, and proposed historical developments.

85.1 Verbal uses of si-

Reflexive si- occurs in verbs of bodily motion, spontaneous change, action involving oneself, and pretending. Nakagawa gives si-turi “stretch,” si-rutu “shift,” si-suye “sway,” and si-yupu “tighten,” derived from transitive bases Nakagawa (2024: 188). Their subjects undergo the movement or change. The available forms and meanings are partly lexical.

Other uses involve deliberate action. Satō's si-kasuy-re means to have someone help oneself. In his indirect-reflexive analysis, the helper acts on the subject, whose participation consists in arranging the help Satō (2007: §3.3); Satō (2008: 250). This account and the traditional intentional/unintentional distinction are competing explanations of the yay-/si- contrast ‹contested›; see Chapter 84 (Reflexive yay- and Its Extensions).

85.2 Causatives and pretending

(1)
ku=ko-si-ranpewtek-ka 1SG.A=APPL-REFL-know.nothing-CAUS
wa CONJ
k=an 1SG.S=exist.SG

‘I was pretending not to know about it.’

Satō 2007: example 6; Chitose

Person boundaries are written with = here. Satō analyzes the involvement of other people's perception as part of the indirect-reflexive meaning.

The simulative reading recurs in si-mokor-e “pretend to sleep” and si-ray-re “pretend to be dead” Nakagawa (2024: 188). The shape si-…-CAUS also permits other readings, as “have someone help oneself” shows. Kobayashi cites deliberate coughing with si-musis-ka, a causative based on a one-place verb Kobayashi (2010: 155–157, §5).

Kobayashi distinguishes causatives of one-place and two-place bases and the order in which reflexivization and causativization apply. With a two-place base, a reflexive can identify the original patient with either the original actor or the added causer, depending on the derivation. For one-place bases he explicitly discusses identity of causer and causee, then relates it to a more articulated underlying structure. He leaves parts of that analysis unresolved ‹contested› Kobayashi (2010: 153–157, §§4.3–5.3). The participant identified by si- therefore requires analysis of the particular construction.

85.3 A subject's own spatial reference point

The prefix also occurs on locative nouns. In Satō's Chitose description, when the locative reference point and the clause subject are coreferential, si- marks that relation. A third-person locative form instead refers to someone else's position Satō (2008: 252).

(2)
si-y-etok REFL-EP-front
un ALLAT
inkar=an look=4.S
akusu CONJ

‘When I looked ahead of myself, …’

Satō 2008: 252; Opening of an oral-literature example

The source writes inkar-an. The consonant y links si- to the vowel-initial noun. Satō rejects i-y-etok and yay-etok for this coreferential reading.

(3)
katkemat woman
si-sam REFL-side
ta LOC
tennep baby
hotkere lay.down
wa CONJ

‘The woman laid the baby beside herself, and …’

Satō 2008: 252; Opening of an oral-literature example

The source continues with her digging lily bulbs. The locative reference point is the woman who is the subject of hotkere.

Satō distinguishes these spatial uses from idiomatic yaykata “by oneself.” He regards their connection with his indirect-reflexive analysis as still uncertain Satō (2008: 252–253). Locative reference and ordinary nominal possession are compared in Chapter 52 (Relational Nouns, Spatial Forms, and Quasi-Incorporation).

85.4 Possessors and the history of the verbal functions

Incorporated body-part nouns can take a reflexive possessor. The Handbook's si-etu-uyna, literally “take one's own nose,” uses the plural stem uyna. It describes astonishment and is attributed to Satō 2018 Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.2.2, example 17). This is a derivational possessor construction, compared with quasi-incorporation in Chapter 90 (Incorporation, Quasi-Incorporation, and Word Structure).

Bugaeva's later historical proposal derives the verbal functions through reflexive → autocausative → anticausative. In this terminology, an autocausative presents self-induced motion, while an anticausative presents a change without an expressed causer. She proposes that yay- retained reflexivity as its main function while si- extended through these other functions ‹speculative› Bugaeva (2025: 179–181, §3.1.2). This proposal accommodates several present-day uses; it does not establish one uniform meaning for every si- word.

References cited in this chapter

Bugaeva (2025) ·Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022) ·Kobayashi (2010) ·Nakagawa (2024) ·Satō (2007) ·Satō (2008)