Chapter 86Reciprocal u- and Joint Participation
Canonical and indirect reciprocals, object-oriented constructions, incorporated possessors, and the distinction between reciprocal and sociative forms.
86.1 Mutual action
In a canonical reciprocal, participants act on one another. Prefixing u- to a two-place verb identifies each participant as both actor and affected participant, producing an intransitive verb with a semantically plural subject Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.2.1). Nakagawa illustrates the pattern with koyki → u-koyki “attack → fight each other” and siru → u-siru “rub → rub against each other” Nakagawa (2024: 186).
‘We held each other and slept.’
Bugaeva & Kobayashi 2022: §4.2.1; Saru, Example 9c; K8109171UP.069
Kimura Kimi's example as quoted in the Handbook. Person boundaries are written with =. The fourth-person forms have inclusive reference in the source translation.
This intransitivizing pattern concerns a two-place base. Other reciprocal constructions retain an object or have reciprocating participants who are objects of a larger causative predicate. Their argument frames belong to the same broader system described in Chapter 73 (Valency and Voice Constructions).
86.2 Retained objects and object-oriented reciprocals
With a three-place base, an indirect reciprocal can identify the actor and addressee while leaving the theme as an object. The Handbook gives u-w-e-pakasnu “teach it to each other,” after Tamura's dictionary. Here w is a linking consonant and e- introduces the subject matter Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.2.1, example 10c).
Causativizing a reciprocal adds a causer. In the following example, the younger brother causes the villagers to fight one another.
‘My younger brother made the villagers fight against each other.’
Bugaeva & Kobayashi 2022: §4.2.1; Saru, Example 11b; K8010281UP.071
The Handbook quotes Kimura Kimi's narrative. The two written a= forms belong to possessed nouns; the verb's causer is the younger-brother phrase.
Joining constructions provide another object-oriented pattern. The joined things can be expressed as two nouns. The Handbook analyzes the base of u-ko-sina as a three-place applicative Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.2.1, example 12).
‘I tried to bundle the bow and an arrow together.’
Bugaeva & Kobayashi 2022: §4.2.1; Chitose, Example 12c; OI990302UP.029
Oda Ito's example. Initial ku means ‘bow’. The full construction with nu is translated as trying to bundle them.
86.3 Reciprocal possession
The reciprocal can supply the possessor of an incorporated noun. The Handbook calls u-oruspe-nu “listen to each other's stories” and u-tek-kisma “seize each other's hands” quasi-possessive reciprocals. It cautiously observes that corresponding non-incorporated expressions seem absent Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.2.1, example 13 and following discussion). Reflexive possessors have related constructions; see Chapter 84 (Reflexive yay- and Its Extensions).
The prefix also occurs with locative nouns, postpositions and adverbs, including u-sam “near each other,” u-tura “together,” and u-neno “similar to each other” Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.2.1). These uses need their own word-class analysis; a nominal or adverbial form does not itself undergo verbal detransitivization.
86.4 Joint participation and sociatives
Some u- formations express joint participation without two parallel acts directed at one another. Nakagawa's u-tures-kor refers to a brother and younger sister, with the brother presented as the grammatical subject. His u-mina-re describes people laughing together. The latter combines a one-place base, a causative and a reciprocal: 1 + 1 − 1 = 1 Nakagawa (2024: 186–187). The conventional meaning is established by usage, beyond this argument count.
Sociative uko- and uwe- express doing something together while retaining the base's valency. The Handbook relates them to reciprocal-plus-applicative combinations Bugaeva & Kobayashi (2022: §4.3.2). Nakagawa contrasts intransitive u-kor “marry” with transitive u-ko-kor “have together” Nakagawa (2024: 211).
‘My wife and I had a daughter together, and we were living there, and …’
Nakagawa 2024: 211; Saru, Example 218
The source gives a collective first-person interpretation. The daughter remains an object of u-ko-kor; the prefix combination contributes joint participation.