Skip to content

Chapter 167Lexical Fields as Grammatical Evidence

Plant, body-part, and weather expressions illustrating possession, number, predication, and regional lexical meanings.

167.1 Vocabulary as grammatical evidence

A semantic field groups words by meaning, but grammatical behavior must be established separately. Body parts illustrate possession; plant terms occur in noun formation and gathering predicates; weather expressions show several kinds of predication. The examples below connect these fields to constructions treated elsewhere in the grammar. Their meanings follow the cited regional descriptions.

167.2 Plants, fruit, and affiliative forms

Satō explains that Chitose epuyke can refer to a flower, bud, or fruit according to context. Its affiliative form epuykehe occurs in this grammatical illustration Satō (2008: 19).

(1)
epuyun bear.fruit
yakun COND
epuyke-he fruit-POSS
ka ADD
k=e 1SG.A=eat
rusuy DES

‘If it bears fruit, I also want to eat its fruit.’

Satō 2008: 19; Chitose

The source's grammatical example; the fruit's possessor is understood from context.

This illustrates both a context-dependent lexical meaning and a possessive form without a separately stated possessor. The general patterns appear in Chapter 43 (Possessive Constructions and Alienability) and Chapter 45 (Affiliative Suffix Patterns). Gathering vocabulary also cuts across simple English equivalents: Satō's kar includes gathering wild edible plants, while Chitose ohawkina corresponds to pukusakina elsewhere Satō (2008: 95, 108).

167.3 Body parts, objects, and counting

Satō describes kema mainly for human legs and cikir mainly for legs of animals or objects. He explicitly notes an exception in cikir-uhosere ‘sit cross-legged’ Satō (2008: 255).

(2)
otcike tray
cikir-i leg-POSS
sine-p one-thing
meske come.off
wa CONJ
isam disappear

‘One leg of the tray came off.’

Satō 2008: 255; Chitose, Lesson 33, example 1

The source explains wa isam as expressing completion with resulting absence. Sinep counts one of the tray's legs.

The example combines lexical selection, affiliative morphology, a numeral expression, and an aspectual construction. Each has its own distribution; the English translation alone cannot predict the Ainu noun or verb form. See Chapter 55 (Numeral Syntax, Ordinals, and Quantity).

167.4 Weather, surroundings, and perceived signs

Satō cautions that maw, often explained as ‘wind’, also occurs with meanings closer to a sign, presence, or impression. His examples include indications of rain, a person's presence, and dawn Satō (2008: 248).

(3)
apto rain
maw sign
an exist.SG

‘There were signs of rain: mist had appeared.’

Satō 2008: 248; Chitose

The translation follows Satō's contextual explanation; maw is not translated mechanically as wind.

Such lexical descriptions complement the grammatical treatment of surroundings and location in Chapter 52 (Relational Nouns, Spatial Forms, and Quasi-Incorporation). Motion terms likewise require their own spatial reference: movement landward from water should not automatically be translated as uphill movement.

References cited in this chapter

Satō (2008)