Knowledge base · Part XIII — Nominalization, Relativization, and Complementation · this topic as a network
106. Nominalized Complements and Control/Raising
How does a language form complement clauses and distinguish them from relative clauses, including in control and raising constructions?
Overview
How are clausal complements formed, and what distinguishes them from other nominalized structures?
Noun complement clauses in Ainu lack an internal syntactic gap and have no underlying base clause. (Bugaeva 2022: 1.6)
The arity-0 diagnostic
What diagnostic uses the arity of the embedded clause to separate complement clauses from relative clauses?
In a complement clause construction, the nominal head only nominalizes the entire clause without having a grammatical role inside it. (Nakagawa 2024: 507) The nouns uske and usi function both as complementizers when preceded by an arity-0 complete clause and as relative clause heads when preceded by an incomplete clause. (Nakagawa 2024: 509)
Complement-taking predicates
Which semantic classes of matrix predicates take nominalized complements?
The selection of a complementizer depends on discourse context and the semantic class of the matrix predicate. (Bugaeva 2012) Certain complement-taking predicates require overt nominalizers such as hi or pe, whereas others allow zero-nominalization. (Bugaeva 2016)
hi as complementizer
What is the function of the maximally abstract complementizer in nominalizing clauses?
The sensory nominalizers as perception complements
How do sensory nominalizers function as perception complement markers?
Noun complement clauses employ a paradigm of possessive evidential forms as complementizers, including ru-w-e, haw-e, sir-i, and hum-i. (Bugaeva 2022: 1.6) Evidential markers in Ainu function as complement clause markers. (Takahashi 2022: 18.7)
kuni as complement marker
What is the semantic profile of the complementizer used for future-oriented or directed content?
Other indirect-speech complementizers
What other elements serve as complementizers in indirect speech and thought?
The use of interrogative particles as complementizers is restricted to ya. (Nakagawa 2024: 333)
Bare complementation
How do languages allow bare finite clauses to function as complements without a nominalizer?
Zero-nominalization represents the oldest stratum of nominalization in Ainu, while nominalizing words developed later. (proposed in Bugaeva 2016) In prolative infinitive constructions, Class II verbs appear in their bare form without personal affixes. (Kindaichi & Chiri 1936)
The constituency of the nominalized clause
What is the structural debate about whether nominalized clauses form a biclausal or monoclausal complex predicate?
Complement clauses in Ainu can function syntactically as S or O, and rarely as A. (Bugaeva 2012) Noun complement clauses pattern syntactically as possessive noun phrases, with the modifying clause serving as the possessor and referent for possessive marking on the head. (Bugaeva 2022: 1.6)