Skip to content

Knowledge base · Part XI — Valency, Voice, and Noun Incorporation · this topic as a network

75. The Transitivizer -ka and Lexical Valency Pairs

How does the language form transitive verbs from intransitive bases using suffixes and lexical pairs?

22 sentences from 18 sources · every sentence names the pages it rests on

Forming suffixes and lexical transitivity pairs

How do forming suffixes create lexical transitivity pairs with vowel or -ke additions?

The suffix -ke is employed for both decreasing and increasing valency. (Bugaeva 2012: 500–501) Non-productive -V and -ka derive direct causative verbs from non-action intransitive verbs and from bound verb roots, whereas -ke derives causatives exclusively from intransitive verbs. (Bugaeva 2014) In derivations from intransitive verbs, the causative suffix -V surfaces as -a, -i, -u, -e, or -o, whereas in derivations from bound roots it surfaces as -i, -u, -e, or -o, with -a not occurring. (Bugaeva 2014) The causative suffixes -ka and -ke attach only to stems consisting of two or more syllables. (Bugaeva 2014) Causativization of intransitives with -ke derives verbs from (a) state/process verbs, and (b) the singular forms of motion verbs ending in -n. (Bugaeva 2014) There are no examples of causative derivation from transitive verbs using -ke. (Bugaeva 2014) The choice among non-productive causative suffixes -V, -ke, and -ka is largely determined according to the semantics of the base verb: -V attaches to process/state verbs and verb roots, -ka to spontaneous processes/actions or internal states/processes, and -ke to processes/states and verbs of motion. (Bugaeva 2014) The only adjunct-reducing suffix is -ke, which marks intransitivity on a small number of verbs expressing violent actions causing change. (Refsing 1986: 189) The intransitivizing suffix -ke attaches to vowel-final verbs, dropping the stem-final vowel before -ke is added. (Refsing 1986: 189) The transitivizing allomorphs -ke, -ka, and a copy vowel attach to intransitive verbs to form transitive verbs. (Refsing 1986: 189) Some morphological causatives have a weakened sense of 'make do' and are better termed simply 'transitivization' (e.g. san 'go down from mountains to seashore' vs. san-ke 'bring out'). (Satō 2008: 237)

ran=an
descend=4.S
‘I went down.’
· constructed
ku=ran-ke
1SG.A=descend-CAUS
‘I lowered it.’
· constructed

The suffix -ka: hosts, dialect distribution, and semantics

Which verbs take the suffix -ka as a transitivizer, and what are its dialectal and semantic restrictions?

The transitivizing suffix -ka is more common in Northeastern Hokkaido dialects and Sakhalin Ainu than in Southwestern Hokkaido dialects. (Bugaeva 2014) The causative suffix -ka attaches sporadically without clear semantic coherence and its distribution does not constitute an areal dialect feature. (Nakagawa 2024: 202) In Southwestern Hokkaido dialects, both -re/-e/-te and -ka causative derivations are recorded for several intransitive verbs without any semantic difference. (Bugaeva 2014) The motion verb rikin 'ascend' takes -ka to form the causative rikin-ka 'raise' in many dialects. (Nakagawa 2024: 202) The causative/transitivizing suffix -ka is attached when the stem ends in m or y (e.g. mom -> mom-ka, uhuy -> uhuy-ka), with exceptions ending in other sounds such as kotuk -> kotuk-ka, paraparak -> paraparak-ka, sések -> sések-ka, teyne -> teyne-ka. (Satō 2008: 236) In Sakhalin Ainu, Murasaki (1978) contrasts the transitive form hosipi-ka 'to send back' with the causative form hosipi-re 'to have someone go home'. (reported in Shibatani 1990: 48)

rikin=an
go.up=4.S
‘I went up.’
· constructed
ku=rikin-ka
1SG.A=go.up-CAUS
‘I raised it.’
· constructed
ku=ko-si-ranpewtek-ka wa k=an
1SG.A=APPL-REFL-know.nothing-CAUS CONJ 1SG.S=exist
‘I pretended not to know about it.’
Satō 2007 · CHI

The transitivizer -kar

How does the suffix -kar productively transitivize intransitive verbs without class or shape restrictions?

The transitivizing suffix -kar adds an object to an intransitive verb, increasing its valency by +1. (Nakagawa 2024: 208)

ku=hotuye-kar
1SG.A=shout-TRVZ
‘I called someone.’
· constructed

Direct causative or forming suffix: the analytical debate

What distinguishes forming suffixes from causative suffixes in the analysis of transitivity pairs?

The unproductive causative suffixes -V, -ke, and -ka mark direct causation. (Bugaeva 2014, Bugaeva & Kobayashi 2022: 15.6) The less productive transitive derivations in -V, -ke, and -ka may syntactically and functionally be analyzed as causatives. (proposed in Bugaeva 2014) In Southwestern Hokkaido dialects, less productive transitive derivations in -V, -ke, and -ka can syntactically and functionally be regarded as causatives. (Bugaeva 2012: 484–485) The non-productive causative markers -V, -ke, and -ka all derive direct causative verbs and form a closed set of 158 items in the 387-verb sample: -V (111), -ka (38), and -ke (9). (Bugaeva 2014)