Knowledge base · Part XII — The Simple Clause and Nonverbal Predication · this topic as a network
94. Pro-Drop, (Non)configurationality, and the Pronominal-Argument Debate
How does the language handle argument omission and the status of bound affixes versus free noun phrases?
Obligatory head-marking and the appositional noun phrase
How does the verb mark its arguments, and what is the status of the noun phrase in apposition?
An overt independent subject noun occurs in the clause as an optional element cross-referencing the third-person subject prefix φ- rather than an obligatory argument. (Satō 2023)
The free ordering of preverbal noun phrases
How freely can preverbal noun phrases be ordered, and what does this reveal about argument structure?
Null arguments and zero anaphora
Under what conditions are arguments omitted, and what discourse functions do overt noun phrases serve?
Personal pronouns in subject and object positions are frequently omitted because person and number are obligatorily marked on predicates. (Bugaeva 2006: 186) Objects that are clear from context are normally omitted, including causee objects in transitive causatives. (Bugaeva 2014) First-person, second-person, and indefinite-person subjects in the main clause are normally omitted because they are obligatorily marked on the verb. (Bugaeva 2015: 56) Third-person subject noun phrases, which receive zero marking on the verb, can be omitted when context is sufficient. (Bugaeva 2015: 56) An argument noun phrase that is clear from context does not need to appear in the clause and is not represented by a pronoun. (Nakagawa 2022: 14.6) A clause consisting of the null third-person subject prefix φ- and a verb is grammatically complete on its own without an independent noun. (Satō 2023)
Discontinuous noun phrases
Are discontinuous noun phrases permitted, and if so, under what conditions?