Knowledge base · Part XVII — Clause Linkage and Adverbial Subordination · this topic as a network
134. Simultaneous kor 'while' and Overlapping-Event Clauses
How does the language express temporal overlap between two events?
The suffix -ike (also hike) forms nouns from verbs or adjectives meaning 'good thing/person', etc., and when introducing a subordinate clause, it expresses meanings such as 'as', 'when', or 'while'. (Kindaichi & Chiri 1936) The conjunctive particle yayne indicates that the next action occurs around the time when a long continued or repeated action ends ('while doing, and finally doing'). (Murasaki 2025: 31) In elder speech, the conjunctive particle ko'ekaari expresses that another action occurs midway through an ongoing action ('in the middle of', 'on the way'). (Murasaki 2025: 32)
The form and its environments
What forms and environments are used for temporal overlap clauses?
The element kor is not a postpositional case particle, but a particle that conjoins two predicates. (Bugaeva 2006: 190) The conjunction kor expresses simultaneous coordination ('while') or conditional meaning ('when/if', equivalent to ko). (Kindaichi & Chiri 1936)
Overlapping events: the simultaneous reading
How does the language mark that two events occur simultaneously?
Unlike Japanese -tsutsu or nagara, the conjunctive particle kor expressing simultaneous or attendant action does not require the subjects of the two clauses to be identical. (Satō 2008: 50, 300, 329) The conjunctive particle kor indicates that two actions take place simultaneously or marks attendant circumstances ('while', '-ing'). (Nakagawa 2024: 340, Satō 2008: 46) In the Saru dialect, the conjunctive particle kor 'while' can be used grammatically even when the preceding and following clauses have different subjects. (Satō 2008: 360, 364) With the conjunctive particle kor 'while', the subjects of the preceding and following clauses do not necessarily have to be identical. (Satō 2008: 344) The conjunctive particle kor expresses simultaneous circumstances. (Satō 2008: 355) kor functions as a conjunctive particle meaning 'while, as, and'. (Satō 2008: 369)
The progressive: kor followed by an existential
How does the language form a progressive aspect from a temporal overlap marker?
Habitual and factual conditional: the whenever reading
How does the language express habitual or factual conditional relations between events?
Dialect distribution and cognate forms
How do dialects differ in marking temporal overlap and habitual conditionals?
In Sakhalin Ainu, the conjunctive particle kanne expresses that an action is performed concurrently or in parallel with another action ('while', 'doing and...'). (Murasaki 2025: 31, 46, 96) In many dialects other than Saru and Chitose, kane is used with high frequency like kor to indicate that two actions are performed in parallel. (Nakagawa 2024: 342) In the Tokachi dialect, the form kan is used in addition to kane, basically also indicating that actions are performed in parallel. (Nakagawa 2024: 342) In the Saru dialect, the conjunctionalizer kor has two meanings: simultaneity (corresponding to Shizunai kane) and inevitable consequence (corresponding to Shizunai konno). (reported in Refsing 1986: 251) In western Hokkaido dialects, kor describes simultaneity between two predicates, whereas kane is a verbal auxiliary expressing surprise. (reported in Refsing 1986: 251)