Knowledge base · Part XV — Evidentiality and Mirativity · this topic as a network
125. Mirativity, Evidential Scope, and Grammaticalization to Sentence-Final Particles
How do mirativity, evidential scope, and grammaticalization to clause-final particles interact within a single evidential system?
Mirativity and the auxiliary aan
What element expresses mirativity when evidential nominalizers do not mark surprise?
The auxiliary verb anan expresses that a fact was not understood at the time but became clear and accepted later. (Satō 2008: 79, 229) The admirative mood auxiliary is aan for singular subjects and rok'oká for plural subjects. (Bugaeva 2012: 492–493) In Chitose Ainu, the admirative mood auxiliary corresponding to Saru aan is an'an. (Bugaeva 2012: 492–493) The form a-(w)an (plural rok-okai) expresses surprise at an unexpected fact or result. (Kindaichi & Chiri 1936) The auxiliary verb aan denotes mirativity as an extension of its meaning. (Yoshikawa 2022: 19.5)
The scope of the evidential predicate
What is the scope of an evidential predicate over the clause it closes?
The grammaticalization cline
How do ordinary sensory nouns grammaticalize into clause-final evidential markers?
In the Horobetsu dialect, evidential markers have grammaticalized into forms that independently introduce adverbial clauses. (reported in Hirosawa 2026)
Double-evidential stacking
The auxiliary anan can immediately follow rok'oka in sequence. (Satō 2008: 79)