Knowledge base · source

Bugaeva 2025

Bugaeva, Anna (2025). A diachronic study of anticausatives in Ainu.

db.aynu.org/2025-bugaeva-anna-a-diachronic-study-of-anticausatives-in-ainu prior-analysis general text held locally OCR pdftotext-pieces: 12 leaves, 0 with a printed page

Chapters citing this source

Sentences of the first edition citing this source

1. Her treatment of the diachrony of anticausatives extends the historical dimension of the valency description. no page The History of Ainu Language Description and Previous Research
2. Bugaeva's 2025 analysis is especially important here: -ke is the primary anticausative marker, while verbal si- is mainly autocausative and only secondarily anticausative . §1.2, §4 Denominal and Deverbal Verb Derivation
3. The diachronic account of the -V and -ke/-ka pairs as anticausatives in origin is explored in . no page The Transitivizer -ka and Lexical Valency Pairs
4. The older direct/indirect terminology remains important for explaining individual examples, but it is no longer the primary glossing distinction used in the morpheme database . §3.1.2 The Reflexive yay-
5. On nouns and incorporated nominals, however, si- is REFL.POSS: it marks the noun as belonging to the clause subject, as in si-ram 'one's own heart' ; ; . §3.1.2 The Reflexive-Possessive si- and the yay-/si- Division
6. Bugaeva's diachronic study of anticausatives in Ainu concentrates on two markers: the primary anticausative / intransitivizing suffix -ke, and si-, whose path is REFLEXIVE > AUTOCAUSATIVE > ANTICAUSATIVE . §1.2, §3.1.2, §5 Middle, Anticausative, and the (Non-)Passive Question
7. The prefix ci- is kept separate as MID/RES, because it suppresses the agent/resultatively profiles the affected participant rather than marking self-causation ; . §1.2, §3.1.2 Abbreviations and Glossing-Symbol Conventions