Knowledge base · source

Satō 2021

Satō Tomomi 佐藤知己 (2021). アイヌ語千歳方言の位置名詞orの用法[Usage of the Position Noun or in the Chitose Dialect of Ainu]. 北方言語研究 11, 81–98.

prior-analysis hokkaido text held locally OCR pdftotext-pieces: 11 leaves, 0 with a printed page

Chapters citing this source

Sentences of the first edition citing this source

1. The locative noun has developed an extended use in several Hokkaido dialects, functioning as a broad oblique marker; its grammaticalization in Chitose is documented in . no page Nominal Subclasses and Obligatorily-Possessed (Bound) Nouns
2. These nouns — , , , , , and others catalogued below — are called locative nouns (位置名詞) in the Japanese-medium descriptive tradition ; ; . no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
3. ; ; no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
4. The distribution of concept vs affiliative form before different case particles for this noun parallels what Satō documents for or in Chitose: both forms are grammatical with a following locative noun, but the short-form fusion (or + ta → otta) is the unmarked spoken realization, while oro ta appears in more deliberate or expanded styles ‹corpus-suggested›. no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
5. Satō's dedicated Chitose study traces the drift of or from a concrete relational noun 'the place of X' toward a grammaticalizing locative morpheme that renders any nominal as a place-designating argument. no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
6. The Chitose corpus adds many parallel instances where abstract events or instruments appear in the host-noun position . no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
7. Whether this drift constitutes the grammaticalization of or into a general locative case-marker, or whether it reflects a productive but still compositional use of the relational noun, is a point on which Satō and Nakagawa take partially different positions ‹contested›: Nakagawa treats the construction as productive composition (noun + spatial-noun + particle), while Satō's Chitose evidence shows or extending into contexts where the 'place of X' semantics is increasingly opaque, suggesting at least the beginning of a grammaticalization cline. no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
8. Satō's Chitose evidence for or shows the form extending beyond referential 'place of X' into a general locative-marking function, which is the expected trajectory of a grammaticalizing postposition, not of a lexical noun. no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
9. Whether first-class members like or and ka are more advanced on a grammaticalization cline toward postpositions than second-class members like kotor is a plausible hypothesis supported by Satō's work on or but not yet generalized across the full inventory ‹speculative›. no page Relational and Spatial (Locative) Nouns and Their Possessed Forms
10. Satō 2021 documents its distributional range in Chitose in detail . no page Postpositions, Local Case, Motion Events, Comitative, and Instrumental
11. The detailed distribution of or vs bare ta in locational constructions is documented for the Chitose dialect by . no page Existential and Locational Clauses (an / oka)
12. Among these, shows a grammaticalization drift in the corpus, encroaching on the functions of a general locative case marker ; . no page Synopsis of Lexical-Semantic Fields