Knowledge base · source

Kaiser 1998

Kaiser, Lizanne (1998). The interaction of noun incorporation and applicative formation in Ainu. Yearbook of Morphology 1997, 157–178.

db.aynu.org/1998-lizanne-kaiser-the-interaction-of-noun-incorporation-and-applicat prior-analysis hokkaido

Chapters citing this source

Sentences of the first edition citing this source

1. The applicative system (e-, ko-, o-) further intersects with incorporation: an applicative argument can be simultaneously incorporated in ways that bear on the syntactic status of both operations ; these interactions are treated in . no page A Typological Profile of Hokkaido Ainu
2. analyses a subset of these configurations as the interaction of NI with applicative formation: a body-part noun is incorporated while the applicative slot is filled by the body-part's possessor, yielding a complex predicate in which the possessor is the new object. 157–158 External Possession and Possessor Raising
3. The applicative account in treats the EP reading as the product of the applicative operation alone, with NI as an independent feeding process ‹contested›. no page External Possession and Possessor Raising
4. Kaiser (1998) examines the morphological properties of this interaction in detail ; the treatment is continued in and . no page The Applicative System: Overview and the Preverb-vs-Applicative Debate
5. Kaiser's analysis of the applicative-incorporation interaction provides a formal account of the feeding relation . no page The e- Applicative
6. Bare obliques are equally inaccessible to the prenominal gap strategy that Hokkaido Ainu uses in relative clauses; applicative promotion again opens the relativization path by moving the nominal to the direct-object tier of the accessibility hierarchy ; ; . no page Applicative Stacking, Ordering, and the Feeding of Relativization
7. The applied object then stands in a relativization-accessible position, and a prenominal relative clause can be formed with that applied object as its head ; . no page Applicative Stacking, Ordering, and the Feeding of Relativization
8. Kaiser (1998) demonstrates that the resulting applied object is treated as a morphosyntactic direct object in the relative clause — there is no distinct 'applied-object relativization' mechanism separate from ordinary object relativization . no page Applicative Stacking, Ordering, and the Feeding of Relativization
9. examines the applicative–incorporation interaction in Ainu systematically; the constraints she identifies align with the analysis in Shibatani (1990) and Nakagawa (2024: 484). no page Oblique Incorporation and the Syntactic-vs-Lexicalist Debate
10. treats the applicative–incorporation interaction as a single system on these grounds. no page Oblique Incorporation and the Syntactic-vs-Lexicalist Debate