Knowledge base · source
Ono 2020
Ono, Yohei 小野洋平 (2020). Reconsideration of “Major Division” of Ainu Dialects: A Statistical Reanalysis of Asai (1974). Northern Language Studies 10, 231–254.
prior-analysis general text held locally OCR pdftotext-pieces: 33 leaves, 0 with a printed page
5chapters citing
13citing sentences
0examples
0statements extracted
0claims with a stance
Chapters citing this source
Sentences of the first edition citing this source
- Ono's reanalysis of the Asai matrix with updated statistical methods partially confirms but also complicates that bipartition , and Kirikae's place-name isogloss study documents the geographical boundary of the par/car alternation across Hokkaido . no page The Dialect Sample and the Corpus-Quantification Method
- reanalyses Asai's cognacy matrix (110 items over 21 lects) with Spectral Clustering (MinmaxCut / Mcut algorithm). no page Hokkaido Dialect Classification and Dialectometry
- Ono notes this converges with earlier work placing North Kuril close to northeast Hokkaido, while a separate observation by Satō and Bugaeva (via ) clusters 19th-century Kuril items with the Saru/Chitose zone — a tension the 2020 study does not resolve ‹contested›. §4 Hokkaido Dialect Classification and Dialectometry
- The one result robust across all methods is that the Hokkaido cluster is more internally cohesive than its gap from Sakhalin ; . §3 Hokkaido Dialect Classification and Dialectometry
- Sōya, at the northern tip of Hokkaido, also belongs here — a significant fact given that Sōya is the Hokkaido locality most closely cognate to Sakhalin in the lexicostatistic matrices of and the dialectometric reanalysis of . no page Hokkaido Dialect Microvariation: Phonology and Morphosyntax
- This is consistent with 's finding that the three-way "Major Division" (Hokkaido/Sakhalin/Kuril) does not survive statistical testing and that even within Hokkaido the internal structure is gradient — a conclusion that the multi-parameter isogloss geography here supports at the segmental and prosodic levels ; . no page Hokkaido Dialect Microvariation: Phonology and Morphosyntax
- This non-congruence is consistent with a dialect continuum undergoing diffusion from multiple centers rather than a single ancestral branching event (; ) ‹contested›. §3 Lexical Dialectology and the Dialect Atlas
- Asai's 1974 cluster analysis of this matrix proposed a partition into northern (Sōya), eastern (Obihiro / Kushiro / Bihoro / Asahikawa / Nayoro), central-southern (Yakumo / Oshamambe / Horobetsu / Biratori / Nukibetsu / Niikappu), and eastern-Hidaka (Samani) zones for Hokkaido, together with a major split between the Hokkaido+Kuril group and Sakhalin (reported via ; ). §2 Lexical Dialectology and the Dialect Atlas
- Asai's linkage methods (single-linkage and complete-linkage agglomerative clustering) ignore mid-range cognacy values that are precisely where the evidence for sub-groupings lies; spectral clustering over the same matrix yields two groups — Hokkaido plus North Kuril vs Sakhalin — without any robust internal three-way split () ‹contested›. §3–4 Lexical Dialectology and the Dialect Atlas
- Second, Ono's reanalysis of the full dataset, including the Sakhalin and Kuril points, places North Kuril lexically closer to northeastern Hokkaido than to southwestern Hokkaido, with Sakhalin forming a clearly separated external group (). §3–4 Lexical Dialectology and the Dialect Atlas
- demonstrates with spectral-clustering methods, however, that the three-way "Major Division" carries no statistically robust support: the cleaner two-way structure is Hokkaido (including the Kuril varieties) versus Sakhalin. no page Sakhalin and Kuril Ainu: The External Comparison
- The lexicostatistic reanalysis of finds the Kuril varieties clustering with the northeast Hokkaido group — Samani, Obihiro, Kushiro, Bihoro, Sōya — rather than with Sakhalin, supporting a two-way Hokkaido-plus-Kuril versus Sakhalin division over the classic three-way one. no page Sakhalin and Kuril Ainu: The External Comparison
- A separate analysis using nineteenth-century Kuril material by Satō and Bugaeva (2019) places the Kuril items closer to southern Hokkaido (Saru/Chitose); the two results rest on different data sets and are not directly comparable ‹contested›. no page Sakhalin and Kuril Ainu: The External Comparison