Knowledge base · source

Hattori & Chiri 1960

Hattori Shirō 服部四郎 & Chiri Mashiho 知里真志保 (1960). アイヌ語方言の語彙統計学的研究[A lexicostatistic study of the Ainu dialects]. 民族學研究 [Minzokugaku Kenkyū], 24(4): 1–56.

prior-analysis general

Chapters citing this source

Sentences of the first edition citing this source

1. The lexicostatistic study he undertook with Chiri Mashiho surveyed 19 Ainu localities — 13 on Hokkaido, 6 on Sakhalin — using a 200-item Swadesh list and established the first quantitative basis for internal dialect classification . no page The History of Ainu Language Description and Previous Research
2. The classification of Hokkaido Ainu dialects rests on a sequence of lexicostatistic and dialectometric studies beginning with Hattori and Chiri's 1960 founding survey , which applied the 200-item Swadesh list to 19 localities (13 Hokkaido, 6 Sakhalin) and established the basic quantitative structure of inter-dialect similarity. no page The Dialect Sample and the Corpus-Quantification Method
3. applied a 200-item Swadesh-based word list to nineteen localities: thirteen Hokkaido sites — Yakumo, Oshamambe, Horobetsu, Biratori, Nukibetsu, Niikappu, Samani, Obihiro, Kushiro, Bihoro, Asahikawa, Nayoro, and Sōya — together with six Sakhalin sites and Torii's 1903 Kuril materials. no page Hokkaido Dialect Classification and Dialectometry
4. The isogloss data in this section draw on , whose underlying documentation comes from and (both reported sources). no page Hokkaido Dialect Classification and Dialectometry
5. All quantitative classifications rest on the matrix of , collected at thirteen Hokkaido sites. no page Hokkaido Dialect Classification and Dialectometry
6. The thirteen Hokkaido Ainu localities surveyed by show fine-grained phonological differences that cross-cut — and in some cases run orthogonal to — the northeast/southwest bipartition established by . no page Hokkaido Dialect Microvariation: Phonology and Morphosyntax
7. §3 catalogues these systematically in a set of isogloss tables whose data derive ultimately from and . no page Hokkaido Dialect Microvariation: Phonology and Morphosyntax
8. Sōya, at the northern tip of Hokkaido, also belongs here — a significant fact given that Sōya is the Hokkaido locality most closely cognate to Sakhalin in the lexicostatistic matrices of and the dialectometric reanalysis of . no page Hokkaido Dialect Microvariation: Phonology and Morphosyntax
9. The irregularity is consistent with the lexicostatistic picture: only 91 of the 200 Swadesh-list items used by showed any cross-dialect stem differentiation, meaning that the majority of the basic vocabulary is shared across all localities without alternation . no page Hokkaido Dialect Microvariation: Phonology and Morphosyntax
10. The tripartition was formalised on geographic grounds in the early twentieth century and appeared to receive objective support from the lexicostatistic studies of and . no page Sakhalin and Kuril Ainu: The External Comparison
11. Within Hokkaido, the dialect geographically and lexically closest to Sakhalin is Sōya, at the northern tip of the island . no page Sakhalin and Kuril Ainu: The External Comparison